Journal #1 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Journal 1 - Essay ExampleMichael, the owner of the Biomedical Tissue Services had a business design where he would pay the funeral directors to be granted the permission to access the dead bodies and later resell spines, bones and other tissues to other firms who needed human pleonastic parts. In the year 2005, Michael was exposed by prosecutors for having gained $4.6 million in just three years. He offered undertakers $1000 for providing access to the dead bodies, paid the cutters $300 to $ calciferol for extracting the wanted organs, and afterwards took home around $7000 per consistency. Later on, the New York Police interviewed the families of 1077 people whose bodies went missing for bones, spines and other tissues.Kristen E. Schleiter, a senior research associate for the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association, in his article DONORS HAVE NO RIGHTS TO DONATED TISSUE explains that one might conduct surrendering self-command of donated tissu es of himself or herself or the person close to him or her. One of the definitions of Autonomy is that it allows an individual to participate in a clinical research and donate the body tissues towards research purposes with the boundaries unclear when the donated tissues depart the body and the recipient accepts them. However, no law has been passed to clearly establish and govern the ownership rights in donated tissues but researchers and institution stand made assumptions that they have the right to study, transfer, collect, or get rid of human tissue specimens and the associated patient data such as genetic testing. There have also been assumptions by researchers that they can use the tissue and other respective body parts to develop a genetic sequence, cell lines and other products that whitethorn be rewarded financially. Moore v. Regents of University of California case proved that even if the excised cells initially belonged to a certain individual, the cells were legally and factually distinct from the research